Answer: A. He will quite certainly gain approval since the project has a positive net present value.
Explanation:
The options are:
A. He will quite certainly gain approval since the project has a positive net present value.
B. Approval is probable but not likely as he failed to account for the time value of money.
C. He will not gain approval as he failed to consider whether the project is leading edge or not.
D. Approval is probable but not likely as the project has been constructed on estimates instead of facts.
Capital budgeting is used to know whether the long term investment for a particular organization's is actually worth investing in or not by the company.
Based on the scenario in the question, since the present value of the estimated future cash flows is greater than the cost of the project, Ashton will quite certainly gain approval since the project has a positive net present value.
Answer:
Yes the inspector should be hired
Explanation:
Defective average = 0.03
inspection rate = 30 per hour
Cost of inspector = 8 per hour
Correction cost is $10 each
No inspection = 9/30
= 0.300
Inspector = 8/30
= 2.67
Yes the inspector should be hired
Answer:
(a) Barton's investment
Date Account Titles and Explanation Debit Credit
Accounts receivables $44,900
($48,000 - $3,100)
Equipment $90,000
Allowances for uncollectible $1,300
Barton Capital $133,600
(To record Barton's contribution)
(b) Fallows' investment
Date Account Titles and Explanation Debit Credit
Cash $28,700
Merchandise Inventory $60,500
Fallow Capital $89,200
(To record Fallow's contribution)
Assuming it’s B) Transitive Tastes
Answer:
the amount that should be excluded from the current liabilities is $750,000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount that should be excluded from the current liabilities is shown below;
= Number of shares in the common stock × selling price per share
= 30,000 shares × $25
= $750,000
Hence, the amount that should be excluded from the current liabilities is $750,000