Answer:
The answer is "$1000 and $2450"
Explanation:
In point a:
Credit of American Refundable Chance:
when deduction is upto credit upto i s refundable
In point b:
deduction for first deduction max upto
Answer:
1 is correct guy for my bea
Answer:
Comment for statement A - The firm must still compare the IRR with the opportunity cost of capital when using the IRR rule. Therefore, even with the IRR method, the appropriate discount rate must still be specified.
Comment for statement B - There should be a higher discount rate on risky cash flows than the rate used to discount less risky cash flows.
Making use of the payback rule is equivalent to using the NPV rule with a zero discount rate for cash flows before the payback period and an infinite discount rate for cash flows thereafter.
Explanation:
a)
“I like the IRR rule. I can use it to rank projects without having to specify a discount rate”
The firm must still compare the IRR with the opportunity cost of capital when using the IRR rule. Therefore, even with the IRR method, the appropriate discount rate must still be specified.
b.
“I like the payback rule. As long as the minimum payback period is short, the rule makes sure that the company takes no borderline projects. That reduces risk”
There should be a higher discount rate on risky cash flows than the rate used to discount less risky cash flows.
Making use of the payback rule is equivalent to using the NPV rule with a zero discount rate for cash flows before the payback period and an infinite discount rate for cash flows thereafter.
Answer:
C) report $5,000 of hobby income and deduct nothing from AGI since Juanita does not itemize deductions.
Explanation:
After the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (HR 1, “TCJA”) from the period 2018 to 2025 the hobbies deduction is no longer valid.
Thus Juanita cannot declare any deduction. As hobbies aren't businesses. They aim for fun and entertainment not profit is not entitled to the tax deduction businesses are.
Answer:
No, he doesn't show diminishing marginal utility. Yes, he shows increasing marginal utility for Coke.
Explanation:
The law of diminishing returns states that the marginal or addition satisfaction or utility derived from the consumption of a product increase until a pint and then starts to decrease.
Units Total utility Marginal utility
1 10 10
2 25 15
3 50 25
After 3 bottles, John does not show diminishing marginal utility as the marginal utility (as shown above) continues to increase with each additional bottle of coke consumed.