After a country loses a war it would be logical that to keep citizens’ enthusiasm up, it would be required to disinform the citizens for them to continue working hard and not revolting. Unfortunately disinforming citizens wasn’t the only tactic governments like Germany used to counter loss of enthusiasm upon their citizens. Arresting protestors, propaganda, abusive police powers, and censorship were also tactics Germany used to combat loss of enthusiasm. Examples of propaganda Germany publicized were normally pictures with resilient soldiers saying things like “we’re almost there” and other phrases to keep citizens' hopes up and even enlist to go to war.
The Treaty of Versailles was created after WWI to get things even with all countries affected by the war. This left Germany in a very bad position considering all the debts they had to pay to the other countries they hurt. With this high debt and lingering guilt, it left Germany with anger worthy of starting another war. Germany ended up disinforming their population and deluding their population into thinking it was the fault of minorities like Jews that caused the mishaps of war.
Haha did the dirty deed
hope it helps :):):)
<span>Before the bridegroom marries Subha, he visits her at her parents' home to inspect her. Her parents (especially her mother) show her off, and the bridegroom (and his friend) approve.
</span><span>The bridegroom came with a friend to inspect the bride. Her parents were dizzy with anxiety and fear when they saw the god arrive to select the beast for his sacrifice. Behind the stage, the mother called her instructions aloud, and increased her daughter's weeping twofold, before she sent her into the examiner's presence.</span>
Evidence to support your credibility and claim. Your claim of the essay is nothing without evidence in body paragraphs
In order to complete the dialogues between Connie and John and between Erica and Manuel, we must take the context into consideration.
The answers to the first dialogue are:
- Yeah, right! One year is long?
The answer to the second dialogue are:
- That’s good. Now what should we do?
- I think I’m going to make the chicken salad
<h3>What is a dialogue?</h3>
A dialogue is a conversation that takes place between two or more people. For this question, we must choose among the answer choices provided which ones best fit the blanks, so that the dialogues make sense.
In order to choose the best answers, we must take the context of each dialogue into consideration. That means we must read the whole dialogue to find clues as to what is going on:
- In the first dialogue, John clearly does not think Connie should buy a new parka. She thinks it is absurd to wear something from last year, but he does not.
- In the second dialogue, Manuel clearly says something that leads Erica to talk about the menus. He also mentions chicken all of a sudden, which means Erica must say something related to chicken as well.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the correct answers to complete the dialogues are the following:
- What’s on your mind? (first dialogue)
- Yeah, right! One year is long? (first dialogue)
- That’s good. Now what should we do? (second dialogue)
- I think I’m going to make the chicken salad (second dialogue)
Learn more about completing dialogues here:
brainly.com/question/13307090
#SPJ1