Did you see the movie The Lord of the Rings? Most people know that it's based on J.R.R. Tolkien's book. But few realize, that by day, Tolkien was a professor of ancient languages. He led a very normal life as a college professor, preparing lectures and grading papers. He loved to write. However, and in his spare time at night, he escaped to a world of hobbits, elves and other creatures. In 1937, he published The Hobbit. Then, he wrote the three novels that are known together as The Lord of the Rings. It took him twelve years. Have you ever seen the three books in one volume? If so, you know how much work Tolkien put into creating his fantasy world. Actually, it's surprising that it took him only twelve years.
Motivation confidence and personality
Answer: It is relevant and sufficient, because she gives convincing examples of how phones support classwork.
Explanation:
Parvati's argument in favor of using cell phones in class is valid and sufficient. The evidence she presents is strong - she claims that cell phones are useful research tools that enable us to find the right piece of information. She also provides specific examples and even explains a situation in her class where cell phones were used. This makes her argument convincing, because she supports her claim with solid evidence.
Answer:
It shows he is arrogant because he talks just as much as Pickering.
Explanation:
"Pygmalion" is a play written by George Bernard Shaw.
Henry Higgins was a professor and the author of Higgins' Universal Alphabet. He is cold-hearted and rude though he was very educated. In Act 1, is the first time when the readers get to meet Higgins. He was sitting at the Covent Garden with others who were waiting for the rain to stop. He was sitting at the back of the crowd noting everyone and making notes.
On page 5, the character of Higgins is developed by picturizing him as an arrogant man as he talks so much. His conversation with Pickering reveals that he is a rude and arrogant man and not a gentleman as one would expect an educated man to be.
Thus the correct answer is the first option.
Answer:
D.A Supreme Court is needed to judge actions based not on what the Constitution says, but on the “spirit” of the law, or the intended effect of the law at the time it was written.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court is made up of several judges, and the characteristic they all share is the fact that they are knowledgeable scholars of the law. This is the main reason why their advice is needed. Over time, our social context, our language, and our experiences as a country change. This can affect our interpretation of the Constitution. This is why it is important for the judges to interpret the "spirit" of the law, or the intended effect of the law at the time it was written.