Answer:
1.
an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one.
2.
a reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading others that an action or idea is right or wrong.
Answer:
late 14c., dictatour, "Roman chief magistrate with absolute authority," from Old French dictator and directly from Latin dictator, agent noun from dictare "say often, prescribe," frequentative of dicere "to say, speak" (from PIE root *deik- "to show," also "pronounce solemnly").
Explanation:
Answer:
He tells us when he has minor flaws such as being afraid.
Explanation:
One of the most common issues making a narrator untrustworthy is his/her bias toward oneself and toward other characters of the story whom he/she likes or does not like.
Most of the time bias is in favor of oneself, in rare cases it may be against oneself - blaming oneself excessively.
Telling one's own minor and/or major flaws is only one of many characteristics to make a narrator trustworthy.
All other options are either insignificant for adjudging him as a trustworthy narrator, or opposite of what makes him trustworthy and neutral.
Second and third options are insignificant (do not contribute in making him neutral narrator)
Fourth option is incorrect because focusing on oneself makes a narrator biased and hence untrustworthy.
Australians? White australians were brought over by the British. They were moved over there on ships if they were criminals it was a sort of massive prison where they would get them to do manual labour and help to colonise the country and take over from the aboriginals I believe.