Answer:
It includes a clear topic sentence and provides effective support.
Explanation:
The solidity of a topical sentence in an argument is not enough for an argument to be considered strong: solidity is a necessary but not sufficient condition. An argument can be solid and yet be a weak argument. For the argument to be considered strong, it must have a well-established and solid topical phrase and have effective support to substantiate the message spoken by the topical phrase. An example of this is the paragraph shown in the question, which is a strong argument because it includes a clear topic phrase and provides effective support.
Answer- B) interviewing the parents of a child who has died of cancer.
Answer:
Don’t do it. Don’t ever call your adolescent “lazy.” This label is more psychologically and socially loaded than most parents seem to understand. To make matters worse, the term is usually applied when they are feeling frustrated, impatient, or critical with the teenager, which only makes insulting injury from this name-calling harder to bear.
“Lazy” can have a good meaning when it is seen as the exception and not the rule, when it is seen as earned and not undeserved. “Having a “lazy day,” for example, can mean rewarding oneself and laying back and relaxing with no agenda except doing very little and enjoying that freedom from usual effort and work very much. When “lazy” is treated as the rule, however, calling someone a “lazy person,” then the working worth of that individual has been called into question. And “lazy” always attacks “work.”