Please help asap no trolls!

Mathematics

1 answer:

vovikov84 [41]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

$D. These\ triangles\ cannot\ be\ proven\ congruent$

Step-by-step explanation:

$We\ are\ given:\\TU=SQ\\TP=PQ\\\angle TPU= \angle SPQ [Vertically\ Opposite\ Angles\ Are\ Equal]\\Hence,\\As\ we\ are\ given,\ 2\ sides\ and\ 1\ angle\ of\ each\ triangle\ correspond,\ we\\ could\ use\ the\ SAS\ Congruency Rule.\\But:\\$

As SAS Congruency Rule tells us that 'Two triangles are congruent only if two sides and an included angle of one triangle corresponds to two sides and an included angle of the other' .

Here,

As ∠TPU and ∠SPQ are NOT the included angle of ΔTUP and ΔSPQ respectively, the two triangles cannot be proven congruent through SAS Congruency.

Note: We also cannot apply SSA congruency as SSA congruency doesnt exist.

You might be interested in

A survey about the student government program at a school finds the following results 190 students like the program 135 Students

Butoxors [25]

190+135+220=445. 360(the degrees in a circle)/445(the number of students)=0.81. Each student is worth 0.81 degrees. 0.81x190(the number of students that like the program)=135.9. That rounds up or 136 so the answer is 136 degrees.

5 0

2 years ago

Which number serves as a counterexample to the statement below. 2X < 3X

vivado [14]

Answer:

-2

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, we want to select a value that makes the expression wrong

The correct answer will be a negative number

Thus, we have it that;

2(-2) > 3(-2)

-4 > -6

5 0

2 years ago

Q#2 Graph the relation in the table.Then use the vertical-line test.Is the relation a function

tresset_1 [31]

The graph of the relation between x and y is as shown in attached figure

By applying the vertical line test we find that the relation is not a function because there are two points which are (1,-1) , (1,3) have the same value of x with different values of y which contradicts with with the rule of function.