Answer:
p value from chi square = 0.081
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that sociologists say the percentage of the classic music lovers is about 5%. From the survey, we know that only 83 out of 2000 people listen to the classic music. Let denote the proportion of the classic music lovers. The hypotheses are H0: p=0.05 vs Ha: p≠0.05
p value = 0.09
Instead of this if we do chi square
H0: Proportion of music lovers is 5% and non music lovers is 95%
Ha: Proportions are not as per the estimate
(Two tailed chi square test)
Observed 83 1917 2000
Expected 100 1900 2000
O-E -17 17 0
chi square
(O-E)^2/E 2.89 0.1521 3.0421
df =1
p value from chi square = 0.081
Though p value is not exactly the same, the conclusion in both tests are the same
Answer:
x = -3
y = 0
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Given</u><u> </u><u>equations</u><u> </u><u>:</u><u>-</u><u> </u>
<u>-x</u><u> </u><u>+</u><u> </u><u>2</u><u>y</u><u> </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>3</u><u> </u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u> </u><u>(</u><u> </u><u>i</u><u> </u><u>)</u>
<u>2</u><u>x</u><u> </u><u>-</u><u> </u><u>3</u><u>y</u><u> </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>-</u><u>6</u><u> </u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u> </u><u>(</u><u> </u><u>ii</u><u> </u><u>)</u>
<u>From</u><u> </u><u>(</u><u> </u><u>i</u><u> </u><u>)</u><u> </u><u> </u>
<u>-x</u><u> </u><u>+</u><u> </u><u>2</u><u>y</u><u> </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>3</u><u> </u>
<u>-x</u><u> </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>3</u><u> </u><u>-</u><u> </u><u>2</u><u>y</u><u> </u>
<u>x</u><u> </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>2</u><u>y</u><u> </u><u>-</u><u> </u><u>3</u><u> </u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u> </u><u>(</u><u> </u><u>iii</u><u> </u><u>)</u>
<u>From</u><u> </u><u>(</u><u> </u><u>ii</u><u> </u><u>)</u><u> </u>
<u>2</u><u>x</u><u> </u><u>-</u><u> </u><u>3</u><u>y</u><u> </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>-</u><u>6</u><u> </u>
<u>2</u><u>x</u><u> </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>-</u><u>6</u><u> </u><u>+</u><u> </u><u>3</u><u>y</u><u> </u>
<u></u>
<u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u> </u><u>(</u><u> </u><u>iv</u><u> </u><u>)</u>
<u>Equating</u><u> </u><u>(</u><u> </u><u>iii</u><u> </u><u>)</u><u> </u><u>and</u><u> </u><u>(</u><u> </u><u>iv</u><u> </u><u>)</u>
<u>x</u><u> </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>x</u><u> </u>
<u></u>
4y - 6 = -6 + 3y
4y - 3y = -6 + 6
y = 0
Putting value of y in ( iii )
x = 2y - 3
x = 2 ( 0 ) - 3
x = -3
Answer:
1. D
2. A
3. C
4. A
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Option 2 - Approximately 24–36 pounds
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : A standard American Eskimo dog has a mean weight of 30 pounds with a standard deviation of 2 pounds. Assuming the weights of standard Eskimo dogs are normally distributed.
To find : What range of weights would 99.7% of the dogs have?
Solution :
The range of 99.7% will lie between the mean ± 3 standard deviations.
We have given,
Mean weight of Eskimo dogs is
Standard deviation of Eskimo dogs is
The range of weights would 99.7% of the dogs have,
Therefore, The range is approximately, 24 - 36 pounds.
So, Option 2 is correct.
Answer:
-9y-2(2-7y)+4 expand the brackets using-2
Step-by-step explanation:
-9y-4+14y+4
arrange the like terms
-9y+14y-4+4
=5y becoz -4+4=0
ans=5y