<span>B. CONCEDE is your answer. Hope it helps.</span>
In the first act, it is introduced to all the main characters such as Capulets, Montague, even dramatic Hero Romeo. In
the precursor to the first act, we are talking about struggles over the
years, two aristocrats "[f]rom ancient grudge break to new mutiny".
Therefore,
we talk about one of the central disputes: that the two familes are
fighting each other. That central conflict enhances the concept of being
hostage against destiny which leads to both Romeo and Juliet's death.
In the first scene, it introduces the characterization of a character centered on Romeo's painful rash emotional heart. In
the second and third scenes of the first act, we were introduced to the
heroine Juliet and gave hints on Juliet about another dispute that
might be involved in Paris.
In
the last scene of the act, the hero and the heroine meet under intense
conditions, show the emergence of character-to-fate confrontation, and
show the conflict of character against character as seen from Tybalt's
anger and insult feeling Capulet's ball.
As
all of these introduce and serve to raise a conflict, we
confirm that the purpose of Shakespeare obviously uses the first act as
an exhibition.
Macbeth's "tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow" speech in Act 5, scene 5 acts as Macbeth's farewell. In it he thinks about the meaning of life and decides that death is something that comes to everyone, people are all just walking the earth with no importance. "Signifying nothing" at the end refers to man's life, it means nothing, according to Macbeth. He relates a person's life to an actor who plays a part on a stage for a couple hours and then disappears, doesn't exist anymore.
This speech shows that he has essentially given up (in his mind) and thinks that life is meaningless.
Definitely number 4, but if you’re allowed multiple answers then it’s be 1,2 and 4 because I’m pretty sure all 3 are wrong
