What we can say with a good deal of certainty is that our sample is biased towards the higher spectrum and that the real value of the mean for our population is lower than the obtained value of our sample. If this is true, we should expect for the standard deviation to be higher than in the population.
Answer:
give me brainliest now plsssss
Step-by-step explanation:
(8x-22)=5x+29
We move all terms to the left:
(8x-22)-(5x+29)=0
We get rid of parentheses
8x-5x-22-29=0
We add all the numbers together, and all the variables
3x-51=0
We move all terms containing x to the left, all other terms to the right
3x=51
x=51/3
x=17
-6.4 – 4(-2.8)
-6.4 – - 11.2 = 4.8
Your answer is B: 4.8
Answer:
600,000 km²
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the exponential regression calculator : the regression fit obtained for the data is :
36510 * (1.08^x)
After 40 years ;
x = 40
Hence,
y = 36510 * 1.08^40
y = 36510 * 21.72452
y = 793,162.27 km
Hence, y is closest to 800,000 km
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
If we let x be the amount of live bait and y be the amount of natural bait, Then we can come up with the following inequalities;
We are told that John would like to get at least 3 pounds of live bait. At least 3 means 3 or more. Since x represents the amount of live bait, we have;
Moreover,we are informed that;
The store sells live bait for $12 a pound and natural bait for $7 a pound. x pounds of live bait would cost 12x while y pounds of natural bait would cost 7y. The total cost would thus be;
12x + 7y
but John only has a budget of $63. This implies that he can spend $63 at most, thus;
Finally we can have our last inequality as;