Answer:
360
Step-by-step explanation: 360 is the least
Answer:
See below
Step-by-step explanation:
Y component of velocity is 70 sin 30°
y position = 3 + 70 sin 30° * t - 1/2 a t^2
when the ball hits the ground y = 0
0 = 3 + 70 sin 30° t - 1/2 (32.2)t^2
- 16.1 t^2 + 35t + 3 = 0
Use Quadratic Formula to find t = <u>2.26 seconds</u>
Horizontal component of initial velocity
70 cos 30° distance horizontal = 70 cos 30° * t
= 70 cos 30° (2.26) =<u> 137.0 ft</u>
There isn't enough info to prove the triangles to be congruent or not. So we can't say for sure either way.
We have angle CAD = angle ACB given by the arc markings, and we know that AC = AC due to the reflexive theorem. However we are missing one third piece of information.
That third piece of info could be....
- AD = BC which allows us to use SAS
- angle ACD = angle CAB which allows us to use ASA
- angle ABC = angle CDA which allows us to use AAS (slight variation of ASA)
Since we don't know any of those three facts, we simply don't have enough information.
side note: If AB = CD, then this leads to SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem. If we had two congruent sides, the angle must be between the two sides, which is what AD = BC allows.
This is just an algebraic problem, the correct option is:
<em>"Myra should have multiplied 4.5 and 2.1 first."</em>
<h3>
How to evaluate an expression?</h3>
Here we want to evaluate the expression:
-31.7 + 4.5*x
in x = 2.1
This just means that we need to replace x by 2.1 in the given equation.
Now, what Myra does is:
-31.7 + 4.5*2.1 = -27.2*2.1
So she took the sum between -31.7 and 4.5 first, this is her mistake, you only would do that if the expression was:
(-31.7 + 4.5)*2.1
But in our expression:
-31.7 + 4.5*2.1
The first thing you need to solve is the product in the second term, so we get:
-31.7 + 4.5*2.1 = -31.7 + 9.45 = -22.25
If you want to learn more about algebra, you can read:
brainly.com/question/4344214
Answer:
x ≥ $750
Step-by-step explanation: