Answer:
The correct answer are: peripheral route; you do not have strong arguments for why your product is superior
Explanation:
The peripheral route, instead of examining the relevant arguments for the matter, individuals examine the message quickly or focus on simple indicators that help them decide whether to accept or reject the position advocated in the message. The elements that are peripheral to the arguments of the message are those that take center stage. These may include the communicator's physical attractiveness, the direct style of speaking, or the pleasant association between the message and the music that is heard in the background. Sometimes, the strength of the arguments is of secondary or almost null importance. Sometimes we lack the motivation, ability or time to reflect carefully. If we are disinterested, distracted or busy, we may not take the time to analyze the content of the message. Instead of analyzing whether the arguments are convincing, we will most likely follow the peripheral route, focusing on clues and indicators that activate automatic acceptance without too much cognitive processing. Peripheral processing allows communicators to design simple claims and messages to influence individuals. Although on many occasions this route may seem like the panacea of contemporary persuasion, the truth is that a good part of it is also carried out through mechanisms that involve careful and reflective considerations of the message's arguments, since, as we have indicated, When people have some motivation or are able to process messages, they are not based exclusively on peripheral cues and signals, or necessarily fall into the tricks of the persuader. When processing peripherally, people always rely on simple rules, to make decisions, "heuristic." For example the "heuristic" that experts should be believed and only for this reason accept the recommendation of a speaker, the heuristic "if many people think that something is good, then it should be" or those of reputation, consistency and security apparent in the argument. Peripheral and superficial processing does not produce profound and lasting changes of opinion. The effects of surface processing are ephemeral but relevant enough to convince an undecided voter or push a consumer towards the purchase of one or another product.
Answer:
The answer is:
The Kincaids can sue David and Sandra Dess because they can be considered intended beneficiaries of the contract between them and Sirva.
Explanation:
Intended beneficiaries are third parties in a contract that can sue the promisor for breach of contract.
In the contract, David and Sandra agreed to fully disclose all information about the property. Under the terms of the contract, they agreed that Sirva and "other prospective buyers" could rely on their disclosures.
The fuel is exposed to heat and oxygen and it burns producing byproducts and heat. The heat is ultimately often used in an engine to reduce motion for transportation some other form of mechanical motion or Electricity
By the year of 2013 the number of high school students took classes that could earn them college credits in advanced placement or international baccalaureate course has increased to 33 percent, it is only 19 percent in the year 2003 so it had increase by 24 percent but the answer is 33 percent.
Answer: Jack Corp's D/E ratio is 0.67.
We follow these steps to arrive at the answer:
We begin with the DuPont Identity for Return on Equity (RoE)
Substituting the values from the question in the DuPont identity we get,
So,
Substituting the value of equity multiplier in the formula above we get,
Now,
So,
Now that we have the proportions of debt and equity to total assets, we can find the Debt Equity (D/E) ratio as follows:
Substituting the values we get,