Answer: D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
Explanation:
The options include:
Removing the quotation by Redouan Bshary because his conclusions are at odds with Gallup's
B. Changing the thesis statement to argue that the study was faulty because it did not follow Gallup's methodology
C. Incorporating Gallup's response into the first paragraph after describing his original study on Chimpanzees
D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it
E. Expanding on the description of the cleaner wrasse's penchant for eating parasites off other fish.
The change that the writer will need to make in order for this new information to work in the context of the overall argument the writer is making is to update the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
When this is done, it should be reliable to the readers which can be done by supporting the statement with facts.
Answer:
Once I woke up from a dream and looked around because I was once dreaming that there was a virus I was watching the news on T.V. and saw that they never mentioned about a new virus.
I talked about it to my sister and she said there was no new viruses just Coronavirus.
I was relieved.
Explanation:
:-)
Answer:
Explanation:
Era relates to science because era means "a major division of time that is a subdivision of an eon and is itself subdivided into periods."
