Answer:
fast would be the first one and the second would be amazingly.
Explanation:
hope it helps you friend ☺️
A dependent clause. Because this sentence only give an action, there is no cause for this action unless given said cause.
Answer:
I would say C, maybe.
Explanation:I chose C because I feel like people might believe something more with that data and proof because technically that is what this world is honestly based on if you have proof of something anyone will believe.
Answer:
Parallelism
Explanation:
The given excerpt is an example of parallelism.
Parallelism (also known as parallel structure or parallel construction) is a figure of speech in which phrases in a sentence are grammatically the same or similar in construction, sound, meaning, or meter. The purpose of parallelism is to give balance, clarity, pattern, or rhythm.
In the second sentence of the excerpt, we have several repetitions:
- <u>There was </u>no hurry, for <u>there was</u> nowhere to go. (there + past simple tense + negation)
- ... nowhere <u>to go</u>, nothing <u>to buy</u> and no money <u>to buy</u> it with, nothing<u> to see</u> outside the boundaries of Maycomb County. (negation + infinitive)
- ... <u>nothing to buy</u> and no money to buy it with, <u>nothing to see</u> outside the boundaries of Maycomb County. (a part of the repetition I previously pointed out - nothing + infinitive).
Can you give us the sentence, please?
