Answer:
Okay
Explanation:
The answer is jjgxhkdyyffhohohugugojjhyfyffygihhhyghv28283939
A problem in developing effective compensation for teams is that rewarding individuals erodes cohesiveness. Thus the first option is correct.
<h3>What is Cohesiveness?</h3>
Cohesiveness refers to the act or the property of togetherness. in the group , cohesiveness can be seen when the group performs the activity. It is important to have cohesiveness in every group for the accomplishment of the task.
When a individual in a group is provided a compensation it leads to dispute and chaos which erodes the cohesiveness of the group. Thus the first option is correct.
Learn more about Cohesiveness here:
brainly.com/question/13774781
#SPJ1
Answer:
Complementary goods
Explanation:
Complementary goods are goods that are demanded for together or consumed together. If the demand for one of the complementary goods increases, the demand for the other good increases and vice versa.
If the price of coffee increases by 10%, the demand for coffee and doughnut would fall according to the law of demand.
I hope my answer helps you.
Answer:
A. Competitive markets face perfectly elastic demand and marginal revenue, while monopolies face downward-sloping demand and marginal revenue.
Explanation:
In the case when competitive firms and monopolies generated at the level in which the marginal cost is equivalent to marginal revenue keeping the other things constant so the price should be less in the competitive market as compared to the monopoly because in the competitive markets it face perfectly elastic demand but in the monopoly it face the down ward sloping demand curve
Therefore the option a is correct
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Yes, but only to clarify the ambiguous contract terms
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Breach of contract is a legitimate reason for activity and a sort of common wrong, wherein a sound understanding of anticipated trade isn't regarded by at least one of the gatherings to the agreement by non-execution or obstruction with the other party's presentation.
A material breach is the most genuine type of break of agreement. In these cases, somebody has failed to maintain their obligations as spread out in the contract. At the point when this happens, the harmed party can seek after harms in a standard suit. In the end, when a contractual worker finishes an undertaking yet isn't paid, this is viewed as a material breach.