Answer:
The principle in Law 'Nemo dat quod non habet' states that an individual connot give what he does not have
Indeed Tom can rescind the contract with Matthew as he possesses voidable title to the balls
Explanation:
Until consideration has moved from Matthew to Tom the validity of the agreement/Contract remains inconclusive.
Considering his Account is not funded means he has no valid title to the Balls, he is merely in possession of the Balls but not the Owner.
Tom can sue demanding a return of the Balls irrespective of Matthew having sold them to Aaron.
Another illustration could be given of a thief who sells off a property. Inspite of the Buyer being unaware, because the thief has a voidable title it makes the transaction invalid.
<span>Low-cost price leaders normally employ such strategies as price-matching to direct more sales to them and away from rivals. This is the used by Wal-Mart as it redirects sales to it self from rivals like Aldi, best -buy and other retailer. Amazon employs this strategy as well by asking customers to report lower prices online.</span>
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Well public is all about quality
Answer:
10%
Explanation:
Use future value formula
Future Value = Present Value ((1+r)^n)
26,600 = 20,000 ((1+r)^3
26,600/20,000 = (1+r)^3
1.33 = (1+r)^3
1.33^1/3 = 1+r
1.0997 = 1+r
1.0997 - 1 = r
r = 0.997 = 9.97% = 10% (rounded of to the nearest whole percentage)
The correct answer is retailing.
Retailing is the process of selling goods and services to individuals for their personal use. You have stores, which are considered to be retailers of particular goods and services, and then you have customers who go there to buy those goods and services.