the answer is a. diphthog
she did not cause him to recoil from her
According to elm more long-lasting changes in audience perspectives occur if listeners process the speech message "centrally."
<h3>What is ELM?</h3>
ELM stands for elaboration likelihood model.
The dual process theory known as the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) of persuasion describes how attitudes change. Richard E. Petty and John Cacioppo created the ELM in 1980. The model seeks to clarify various methods of processing stimuli, their uses, and the effects they have on attitude change. The center route and the periphery route are the two main paths for persuasion suggested by the ELM.
The genuine qualities of the data offered in favor of an argument will probably be carefully and thoughtfully considered by a person under the central pathway, leading to persuasion. The central route requires a high degree of message elaboration in which the person receiving the message generates a significant amount of cognition about the arguments. The effects of changing one's attitude will be reasonably long-lasting, resilient, and behavior-predictive.
On the other hand, under the peripheral approach, persuasion happens when someone associates with favorable or unfavorable cues in the stimulus or makes a straightforward assumption about the merits of the stance that is being promoted. The cues that the person receives via the peripheral channel are typically unrelated to the stimuli' logical quality. These indications will be related to things like the message's production value, the message's sources' attractiveness or legitimacy, or both. The chance of elaboration will depend on a person's drive and capacity to assess the argument being made.
To learn more about elaboration likelihood model (ELM) with the help of given link:
brainly.com/question/15827409
#SPJ4
The correct answer is B. find a specific person to address in the letter
I assure you the answer is correct, as i have just completed the corresponding quiz.
Answer:
The theme about the unexpected good endings to problems is supported mainly through the character of Mrs. Pringle. The problem of who and how many guests arises from what she wants and is presented through her words and actions. At the end of the play, she announces the unexpected ending by stating how happy she is to have the Prince of Wales instead of Oliver Farnsworth, whom she had been counting on.
All three characters support the theme of people going overboard to reach high social standing. Mrs. Pringle supports this in her reasons for having the party in the first place and the fuss she makes over the details. The words and actions of Elaine and Dunham support the theme in that they provide the ideas that feed Mrs. Pringle’s frustration. They keep her updated on the changing number of guests and the situation regarding the amount of food.