The claims Harvard debater made to justify civil authority were , Fighting for your country with violence can be deeply moral, demanding the greatest sacrifice of all: life itself. Nonviolence is the mask civil disobedience wears to conceal its true face: anarchy .
World War II was the most deadly military conflict in history. An estimated 70-85 million people have died. That's about 3% of the (estimated) 2.3 billion people on Earth in 1940. Estimated deaths directly caused by war are estimated at 50-56 million, and deaths from war-related illnesses and famine are estimated at 19-28 million. The total death toll of civilians was 50 to 55 million.
Military deaths from all causes ranged from 21 to 25 million, including the deaths of approximately 5 million POWs. More than half of the total casualties are accounted for by the ROC and the Soviet Union casualties. If possible, statistics on the number of military injuries are included.
Recent historical disciplines shed new light on the subject of World War II victims. Studies in Russia since the collapse of the Soviet Union have led to revisions to estimates of Soviet deaths in World War II.
Learn more about World War here: brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ4
Answer:
Answer for question 1: Re-enactors will never be able to completely replicate all of the situations and challenges of life in the past. Re-enactors, like historians, suffer limitations that cannot be ignored. A paucity of historical sources, for example, may mean that a recreated regiment can never be certain that its clothes are identical to those worn by troops serving in the regiment in the past. Furthermore, for the reasons of cleanliness and safety, certain characteristics cannot be replicated. Most re-enactment groups attempt to compensate for these inescapable modern effects (such as the use of modern toilets rather than digging a trench and food carried from home rather than scavenged in a nearby village) by striving for a realistic representation in every other manner.
Answer for question 2: In the absence of an audience, mainstream reenactors make an effort to appear real, yet they may fall out of character. Hidden stitches and undergarments may not be period-appropriate, but visible stitches are likely to be made in a period-correct manner. Food served in front of an audience is likely to be historically accurate, although it may not be seasonally or geographically appropriate. Modern things are occasionally utilized "after hours" or in a covert manner. The normal approach is to put on a nice show, but correctness is only required to the extent that others can see it.
Explanation:
Visitors to re-enactment activities obtain an understanding of a particular period. They gain an appreciation of how different life was in the past by simply asking questions, watching how food is prepared over a campfire, and looking at the tents that were used to sleep in. It's a true hands-on experience, since visitors are frequently allowed to sample food, touch uniforms to feel how heavy the cloth is, and learn about the steps involved in firing a musket. Through these contacts with the public, re-enactors pass on their expertise and perspective, making history very accessible. This is what distinguishes re-enactment from more traditional methods of teaching and learning history.
Your answer is A, hope this helps
