Answer: B
Explanation: a summation is a final statement that a lawyer gives to the judge to encourage the judge that their client is not guilty.
answer d is wrong because jurors don't solely decide whether the client is guilty or not
answer c is wrong because a summation has nothing to do with the "judges instruction"
Answer a is wrong because a summation is a closing statement that the lawyer makes.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Red herring. This fallacy blames something entirely irrelevant on the cause of something else. E.g. This happened and so did that. Therefore, this caused that.
Both C and D have to do with attacking arguments or people, E is simply aggrandizement, and B is coming to an illogical conclusion.
<span>Example: Pink for girls and blue for boys – I can’t believe people still follow to this cliché</span>
TV show: Stanford Pines
Book: Alex Hirsch and Rob Renzetti
2 & 4 pretty much since main ideas is what you read about you gather those ideas information and organize a formative paragraph with 2&4 makes sense the narrator and how it implies to the character
