Answer:
y≤-1/3 (fraction)
And on the number line it will start from -1/3 (-0.333) and go less than -1/3 ( to the left, and it will be shaded
Step-by-step explanation:
First we expand the brackets, making it -15y+12≥17
Then we move 12 to the other side, making it negative, -15y≥17-12
Simplify, -15y≥5
Then we divide on both sides to isolate y, flipping the greater than sign to less than because when you divide or multiply by a negative number, the sign flips. y≤5/-15
Then we simplify by dividing the fraction by 5, making it -1/3. y≤-1/3
If you have any doubts, inform me
Answer:
your answer will be option B
you are right
Step-by-step explanation:
have a nice day!!
1−w−w2=64
Step 1: Simplify both sides of the equation.
−w2−w+1=64
Step 2: Subtract 64 from both sides.
−w2−w+1−64=64−64
−w2−w−63=0
For this equation: a=-1, b=-1, c=-63
−1w2+−1w+−63=0
Step 3: Use quadratic formula with a=-1, b=-1, c=-63.
w=
−b±√b2−4ac
/2a
w=
−(−1)±√(−1)2−4(−1)(−63)
/2(−1)
w=
1±√−251/
−2
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
<h3>What is the variables about?</h3>
Note that:
y=-8x+4
y-4=-8x
(y-4)/-8=x
Since the independent variable x is known, one can switch the variable labels and thus it will be:
y=(x-4)/-8
f^-1(x)=(x-4)/-8
This can be written again as:
f^-1(x)=(4-x)/8 :P
Thus one can say No, as he forgot to switch the variable labels after solving for the independent variable.
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
See the first part of the question below
Talib is trying to find the inverse of the function to the right. His work appears beneath it. Is his work correct? Explain your answer.
Learn more about variable from
brainly.com/question/4063302
#SPJ1