Answer:
there is no way to solve it
Step-by-step explanation:
i think you may have missed part of the question
The dog's bowl was empty.
The singer's songs were finished.
Hi there
The formula is
A=p (1+rt)
A ?
P 300
R 0.02
T 3 years
So
A=300×(1+0.02×3)
A=318
Hope it helps
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
