Answer:
In disguise right arrow In Standard Form a, b and c
x2 = 3x − 1 Move all terms to left hand side x2 − 3x + 1 = 0 a=1, b=−3, c=1
2(w2 − 2w) = 5 Expand (undo the brackets),
and move 5 to left 2w2 − 4w − 5 = 0 a=2, b=−4, c=−5
z(z−1) = 3 Expand, and move 3 to left z2 − z − 3 = 0 a=1, b=−1, c=−3
Step-by-step explanation:
sorry it took so long
Answer: The answer is Yes.
Step-by-step explanation: Given in the question that Radric was asked to define "parallel lines" and he said that parallel lines are lines in a plane that do not have any points in common. We are to decide whether Radric's definition is valid or not.
Parallel lines are defined as lines in a plane which never meets or any two lines in a plane which do not intersect each other at any point are called parallel.
Thus, Radric's definition is valid.
Step-by-step explanation:
tanB + cotB = (sinB)/(cosB) + (cosB)/(sinB)
= (sin2B + cos2B)/[(cosB)(sinB)]
= 1/[(cosB)(sinB)]
= (1/cosB)(1/sinB)
= (secB)(cscB)
<h3>
Answer: True</h3>
Explanation:
Technically you could isolate any variable you wanted, from either equation. However, convention is to pick the variable in which isolating it is easiest, and most efficient.
The key thing to look for is if there's a coefficient of 1. This is found in the second equation for the y term. Think of -4x+y = -13 as -4x+1y = -13. Due to the coefficient of 1, when solving for y we won't involve messy fractions.
If you were to solve for y, then you'd get y = 4x-13, which is then plugged in (aka substituted) into the first equation. That allows you to solve for x. Once you know x, you can determine y.
Answer:
18.6 ounces
Step-by-step explanation:
