Answer:
Atticus says that Bob Ewell must be crazy to attack Jem and scout, it is the only explanation he could think of that will justify a man to attack innocent children.
Heck Tate disagrees and says Bob Ewell was just mean and had enough liquor in him to make him brave enough to attack children, implying that he was a coward.
Of the two, Heck Tate's explanation is the most correct and the one that aligns with how I feel about Bob Ewell.
Explanation:
Atticus cannot understand what could possibly make a man want to kill children unless the man is mad, so he says Bob Ewell was crazy.
Heck Tate however, assures him that Bob Ewell was not crazy but just "mean as hell" and a coward on top of that, so his attack on the children was inevitable.
Heck Tate's explanation is the correct one.
Answer:
A.By conveying a mood and point of view to a audience
Explanation:
Answer:
I would say to use all the parties involved to shape their experience from a different perspective. The way you shape your perspective can have a big impact on how your reader sees your all-inclusive and overall plot. The author should take part as one of the characters and you should show WHAT happened and you need to establish your perspective uniquely. A key thing is that you want your reader to take away from what you are writing, and the tone of voice you are using. Also for the problem, why was it a problem? Who helped solve or help the problem? If there is a solution, then explain that in detail, and since it is a personal narrative, how do you feel overall from the problem or conflict? I HOPE THIS HELPS, PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG!
A. settlement
hope it helps you!
Answer: B
Explanation: the answer is B because "go" is a action verb
