a. 4 – commutative property
b. 5 – commutative property
c. 0 – identity property
d. 4 – associative property
_____
The commutative property lets you swap the order: (a) + (b) = (b) + (a).
The associative property lets you change the grouping: (a+b)+c = a+(b+c).
The identity property lets you add 0 without changing anything: (a) +0 = (a).
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
If we let x be the amount of live bait and y be the amount of natural bait, Then we can come up with the following inequalities;
We are told that John would like to get at least 3 pounds of live bait. At least 3 means 3 or more. Since x represents the amount of live bait, we have;
Moreover,we are informed that;
The store sells live bait for $12 a pound and natural bait for $7 a pound. x pounds of live bait would cost 12x while y pounds of natural bait would cost 7y. The total cost would thus be;
12x + 7y
but John only has a budget of $63. This implies that he can spend $63 at most, thus;
Finally we can have our last inequality as;
x+y=19 and 6.5x+3y=74.5 can be used to determine the number of gifts wrapped and number of giftbags prepared where x represents the wrapped gifts and y represents giftbags.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let,
x be the gift wrapped with wrapping paper.
y be the gifts in gift bag.
Time for wrapping one gift = 6.5 minutes
Time for doing 1 gift bag = 3 minutes
Total gifts = 19
Total time = 74.5 minutes
According to given statement;
x+y=19
6.5x+3y=74.5
x+y=19 and 6.5x+3y=74.5 can be used to determine the number of gifts wrapped and number of giftbags prepared where x represents the wrapped gifts and y represents giftbags.
Keywords: linear equation, addition
Learn more about linear equations at:
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
Type II error
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the definition of type II error, the type II error arises when we wrongfully accept the null hypothesis. It means that when we accept our null hypothesis and null hypothesis is not correct then type II error arises. So according to situation we are accepting the null hypothesis that the food is safe but it is actually not safe. Hence the given situation represents type II error.
