Answer:
exporting trading company
Explanation:
Eks-Plore doesn't actually manufacture any outdoor gear. it provides trading services to companies that manufacture them. Eks-Plore sells goods produced in the US and exports them to foreign markets, e.g. European and Asian nations. This is a type of intermediary that is also responsible for located new potential markets where to sell the goods.
Answer:
Keeping its interest rates low
Explanation:
Interest rates correlate with the exchange rate of a country. Low-interest rates are unattractive to foreign investors. Investors associate low-interest rates with reduced returns. In the foreign exchange market, the demand for such a country's currency will below, resulting in a lower exchange rate against other currencies.
If a country has low-interest rates, its currency will be in low demand, meaning its strength will be relatively weaker against the US dollar. One dollar will be able to buy a large quantity of goods and services from such a country. In other words, that country's exports will be cheaper in the USA.
Answer:
d) communicate value
Explanation:
the question was missing the options:
a) deliver value
b) forecast value
c) explain value
d) communicate value
In marketing, communicate value refers to getting your customers (potential in this case), to believe that they are getting a good deal when they purchase your products or services. We all assign come type of value to our purchase decisions, and when we assign a higher value than its to a product, we as customers get customer surplus. The higher the value that our customers believe that our product is worth, the more they will be willing to pay for it. When customers feel that our product is not worth its price, then they will simply stop purchasing it.
The reason that Larceny is easier to detect that skimming
because this is associated with having to steal the cash only after that it has
been recorded by the accounting system of the company in which makes it easier
to detect unlike skimming. The answer is letter b.
Answer:
The correct answer is the tax on food processors was unconstitutional.
Explanation:
On January 6, 1936, the Supreme Court decided in the United States v. Butler, that the act was unconstitutional for the collection of this tax on processors only so that it will be returned to the farmers. The regulation of agriculture was considered a state power. As such, the federal government could not force states to adopt the Agricultural Adjustment Act due to lack of jurisdiction. However, the Agrarian Law of 1938 remedied these technical problems and the agricultural program continued.
