Enjoying poetry is probably not something that would
separate a person from broader culture because all people enjoy different
things. This would lead to the question,
then, “Why would all things separate people from each other?” If that were so, society would be separated
into tiny fragments based upon likes, which is not really the case when you
think about it. Within any group of
people, you will find each like different things—you will find artists who like
mountain climbing and those who don’t; you will find mountain climbers who like
knitting and those who don’t. If
anything, it would provide another element with which people could potentially
connect to another facet of the broader culture to which they belong. Because of that same rationale, the reading
of popular novels can definitely be seen to connect us. Additionally, even if some people liked a
popular novel and some people did not, they could have the opportunity to
connect in a conversation where they discussed their reasons for their
respective feelings for the novel. Thus,
literature of all types has a unifying element however small or insignificant
it may seem.
Generally members of a family have knowledge/experience with computer operations related to personal use and work use.
Some knowledge is related to:
- Use of software such as Internet Browser and Operating System.
- Use of hardware such as keyboard for typing and monitor for viewing images.
Therefore, the personal and professional use of a computer requires basic knowledge, usually for carrying out work on specific systems, saving files, entertainment such as games and music, browsing the internet, etc.
It is necessary, however, to know the basics about computer security, since on the internet it is very easy to infect the computer with malicious programs that contain viruses that can steal information and damage computer components.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/3133101
Answer:
you need to show us the photo/painting
Explanation:
Metaphysical conceits are not too strictly defined, but the general idea is that the poet makes use of a clever and unusual extended metaphor throughout much or all of a poem.
In Holy Sonnet XIV, the idea of the speaker as a city barricaded against God's advances is a metaphysical conceit.
Donne is really interested in physical, earthly love, but also really into God and holiness. The huge problem he must deal with is that he is trying to define a sacred, spiritual relationship, but the only tools at his disposal are the language we use and the lives we lead here in the non-sacred world. The Bible makes a big point of this the language God uses is not the language we can use, so the kinds ofcomparissons Donne can make are inherently limited. Our words and metaphors just cannot describe what happens when you get close to God. Donne writes about something he really cannot express, and that struggle is a big calling card for all of his poetry.
It is in the final couplet, that Donne describes how he 'never shall be free' unless God 'ravishes' him. This powerful image that is deemed as holy creates a paradox between purity and sin, symbolising God dominating Donne with ultimate control to become unified as one in the hope of gaining an immortal partner.
Considering John Donne's personal and professional history, Holy Sonnet XIV can also be seen as a personal processing with his own struggle with God and religion in general.
These comparison were very useful to understand the whole poem and read it in a deep way.
