Answer:
b. Budgeted unit sales - beginning merchandise inventory + desired merchandise ending inventory.
Explanation:
Since, the total purchases in units means the number of units that the company needs to buy after maintaining the necessary closing inventory to meet the budgeted sales. The total units required should therefore be equal to the total of the budgeted sales units and the units for the closing of inventory.
Also, if the opening inventory exists out of the total units required, then that number of merchandise does not need to be purchased as it already exists.
Therefore to reach the required purchase unit we need to add budgeted unit sales and desired merchandise ending inventory and deduct the beginning merchandise inventory.
So, the correct option is b.
Answer: 2.91 years
Explanation:
The discounted payback period calculates how long it takes for the cummulative discounted cash flow to equal the amount invested.
Please check the attached image for the table explaining how the answer was gotten.
This is false because consumer surplus declines because of the increase in price and reduction in quantity.
<span>Laura should both reduce her variable costs and increase her total revenue. If she charged 10% more ($275 instead of $250) and reduced her variable costs by 10% ($162 instead of $180), she would nearly double her profits. She would profit $93 per cake compared to her current $50.</span>
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
