Which best explains why Arnall wanted to give 18-year-olds the right to vote?
His son was 18 years old and he felt he should vote.
He wanted to pay back young people for their support.
He wanted to teach the old power structure a lesson.
He felt if you could fight in a war, you should be allowed to vote in elections.
Some people are saying it's C-Deeply personal. Although, to be honest, ALL literature is A because it depends on how you interpret it. That's why we have literature classes and 10 people can write 10 different opinions on what the literature is saying. Since contemporary simply means the writing written after WWII era, it can range so much, that saying it's deeply personal, in my opinion, is too broad. So I would say A, unless you have something in your reading/lessons that say otherwise, or gives a specific answer.
Answer:
the answer is the first option
Explanation:
yourwelcome and go subscribe to my YT channel BlxeVxbes
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
The first statement shows bias. This statement is an opinion about Senator Gomez, while the other statements are facts regarding the election.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
D. Being actively involved in class brings greater student success.