Yes, often more power actually. When you’re trying to convince someone of something the most powerful and swaying argument is one that includes a certain amount of emotion (pathos). So for example, instead of just speaking about dying animals to argue for climate change, it is much more effective to tell a personal or emotional story involving the effects climate change has had a you or other real people. Hope that helps :)
Answer:
They talk to each other if this is good or bad of the complaint and look up in the internet of how people had to do things in order to stay alive, even if they don't want to do it. The conclusion is that the country and the president would find it unconstitutional about the: "you must fight against your own country" because it's not right to fight your own country.
Explanation:
You're welcome :)
Hello. Unfortunately you did not comment on the article to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
To answer this question, you must first read the article to which the question refers. Then you need to identify which element caused the students to think that there would be no prom, that is, you need to identify for what reason, there would be a possibility that this ball would not happen. That reason was what provoked the students' thinking and is the answer to your question. For example: The city may have gone through a natural disaster, the graduation class suffered a huge loss, there was not enough money to organize the ball, among others.
1. historical.
2. pop culture
3. families
Answer:
you need to ask for an apprentice to lay out the design.
