You need to put the text up or no one can help you.
A rebuttal is a sort of countering something. For an author to cause his reply to become more grounded, he should point a rundown of defects on the given contention to balance it.
<h3>How can the writer revise the rebuttal to make it stronger? </h3>
Correct answer is option A.
- By rephrasing it as a conclusion.
- This will make it harder for the person who gave the assertion difficult to safeguard the case the individual in question is attempting to shield.
- The counterclaim has one significant component that the rejoinder doesn't, which is a solid and obvious source that upholds their position. In this way, the compose can make their reply more grounded by adding a measurement or citation.
Therefore, correct answer is option A.
For more information about rebuttal, refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/3959097
Answer:
Explanation:
C ) <em>The author eliminates conjunctions to provide a rhythm that impresses upon the reader the many available opportunities.</em>
<em />
I did it in USA TEST PREP
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
In January 1947, the United States Army had an excess of metallic sodium left over from World War II and determined that the alkaline waters of Lake Lenore would be a good spot to dump and neutralize the acidic element, which reacts with water with intense explosions.
This quote has no mention of a deity (divine authority) or society as a whole (civil obedience), and the only mention of gender is the author's reference to his sibling as "brother." The final line "<span>I won't be caught betraying him." drives the assumption that failing to do his "duty to [his] brother" would violate some sort of bond between he and his brother. Since we only know this relationship as familial, we must assume familial loyalty is the theme.</span>