Answer:
option B.
It's a good idea to be aware of a group or individual's agenda before we allow their message to affect our decisions because bias or motives can affect a message no matter how honest the source.
Explanation:
- Inclination towards any subject is directly dependent upon one's motive.
- No matter how honest is the source but his thoughts always reflects the biased opinion according to their agenda and motive.
- So it is always a better option to be aware about the factor that can affect our decision making.
- Get idea from every possible sources and filter it according to their background and agenda.
Shouldn’t there be someone who’s asking this question ?
Both authors of "In Flanders Fields" and "Dulce et Decorum Est!" chose the same historical event as the setting but these books shows the World War 1 from two absolutely different points of view. "In Flanders Fields" author praises and blesses all those warriors who protected their native land fighted for it and its future generations. While reading this story you feel persuasive tone that aimed to make you feel the same. "Dulce et Decorum Est!" shows the most appalling things that happened during the War and urges us that if we had ever been through It all it would have been the worst nightmare in our life. To conclude : in the first story author eulogizes War whereas the second warns against it.
Analytical means logical reasoning
One I have heard at school is that when the people in front of you down the narrow hallway are walking too slow is, "You walk slower than a herd of elephants stamping through peanut butter."