Answer:
management has not explained its business purpose
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the firm is engaged in the new financial transaction that contains the material impact on the earnings so this represents that it could be come under the pre existed accounting standards.
Also everyone should be aware of the business purpose plus it is not established for changing off the financial statements
So it would be suspicious because the purpose of the business could not be explained
Answer:
a). The statement on the income tax form about the deduction for children and other dependents was simply unreadable.
b). The type of career that many graduates are hoping to pursue pay high salaries and provide long vacations.
c). Apparently, the use of robots in factories has been responsible for a great deal of worker dissatisfaction.
d). The problems associated with government deregulation have been responsible for the economic plight of several major airlines in recent years.
e). The impact of computers on our lives is comparable to the impact of the industrial revolution.
f). The amount of money and time I spend on computer games <u>is</u> more than I can afford.
Explanation:
Subject-verb agreement is described as the grammatical rule according to which the subject, as well as, the verb must agree with one another in number. As per the rules, if the subject(noun or noun phrase) is singular, it will take a singular verb while if the subject is plural(noun or noun phrase), it will carry a plural verb.
According to this rule, <u>the first and third sentence fails to follow this agreement</u>. The first sentence inadequately carries a plural verb 'were' with the singular noun ('The statement') and similarly, the third sentence wrongly employs plural verb 'have' with the singular noun 'the use.' The other sentences are grammatically appropriate as the verbs and noun phrases agree in number.
9 yards is 324 inches so they are equal.
Answer:
1.- The operating income would <u>increase </u>for $680
2.- The operating income would <u>decrease</u> for $680
3.- The Operating Income would be $59,500
Explanation:
We are going to use the contribution margin per unit
<u>This way we avoid most of the calculations</u>
1.- Contribution Margin x ΔUnits = ΔOperating Income
CM per units 17 x 40 = <em>680</em>
<em />
2.- Contribution Margin x ∨Units = ∨perating Income
CM per unit x (-40) = <em>-680</em>
<em />
3.- Contribution Margin x Sales Volume - Fixed Cost = Operating Income
17 x 6,800 - 55,700
115.600 - 55,700 =<em> 59,900</em>
