The sequence forms a Geometric sequence as the rule to obtain the value for the next term is by ratio
Term 1: 1000
Term 2: 200
Term 3: 40
From term 1 to term 2, there's a decrease by
From term 2 to term 3, there's a decrease also by
The rule to find the
term in a sequence is
, where
is the first term in the sequence and
is the ratio
So, the formula for the sequence in question is
term =
The sequence is a divergent one. We can always find the value of the next term by dividing the previous term by 5 and if we do that, the value of the next term will get closer to 'zero' but never actually equal to zero.
We can find a partial sum of the sequence using the formula
for -1<r<1
Substituting
and
we have
=
= 1250
Hence, the correct option is option number 1
706,421 rounded to the nearest thousand is 706,000 because the 421 is less than 500 so the 6 would remain a 6.
Answer:
b
Step-by-step explanation:
the step by step explanation is that because the word increase is the clave word just belive in me
The numbers can be 31, 37, 41, 47, 53, and 59.Hope this helps
The emissions per capita measurement is a better because it shows the number of people divided by the emissions.
<h3>What is the difference between total emissions and emissions per capita?</h3>
The emissions per capita show the emissions per each citizen or inhabitant, while the total emissions show only the emissions of the country.
<h3>Which one is better?</h3>
The per capita gauge is better because whether a country is polluting more or not depends on how much each citizen pollutes. This information is useful to create laws that reduce pollution.
Learn more about pollution in: brainly.com/question/23857736
#SPJ1