Answer: The correct answer is B. Yes, because the State B driver's claim is a proper cross-claim and is within the court's supplemental jurisdiction.
Explanation:
Option B is correct because the State B driver can assert his tort claim against the State B manufacturer. The driver's claim is a proper crossclaim and this is because it arises from the same occurrence as with State A consumer's claim.
<span>The company has issued only 510,000 shares out of authorized 600,000 common stocks. As we know that dividend is paid only on issued shared, and treasury stocks do not get any dividend.
So the total amount of dividend that will be paid = 0.65 * 510,000 = $331,500</span>
True !! Can I be marked as brainliest ?!
NOTE: Your question isn't clear, Johnson. Would you mind checking it and writing it in a way you can be better helped?
Meanwhile, I hope these explanation below helps.
Answer and Explanation:
Two goods are said to be complementary goods if an increase in the price of a particular one leads to a commensurate decrease in the demand that buyers placed for the other one.
A good is said to be a normal good if the reason for an increase in demand is due to an increase in the income of the buyers.
A good is said to be an inferior good if there is a decrease in demand even though the buyers have experienced increase in their income.