1 kg ball can have more kinetic energy than a 100 kg ball as increase in velocity is having greater impact on K.E than increase in mass.
<u>Explanation</u>:
We know kinetic energy can be judged or calculated by two parameters only which is mass and velocity. As kinetic energy is directly proportional to the and increase in velocity leads to greater effect on translational Kinetic Energy. Here formula of Kinetic Energy suggests that doubling the mass will double its K.E but doubling velocity will quadruple its velocity:
Better understood from numerical example as given:
If a man A having weight 50 kg run with speed 5 m/s and another man B having 100 kg weight run with 2.5 m / s. Which man will have more K.E?
This can be solved as follows:
It shows that man A will have more K.E.
Hence 1 kg ball can have more K.E than 100 kg ball by doubling velocity.
Answer:
Part a)
Part b)
North of East
Explanation:
Speed of train towards East = 60 km/h
displacement towards East is given as
now it turns towards 50 degree East of North
so its distance is given as
then finally it moves towards west for 50 min
Now the total displacement of the train is given as
now total time duration of the motion is given as
now average velocity is given as
Part a)
magnitude of the average velocity is given as
Part b)
Direction of the velocity is given as
North of East
Formulae for Kinetic energy is:
Kinetic Energy= 1/2xmassx(velocity)^2
For comparison we need to have same units,thus we convert 10g into Kg.
10g/1000=0.01Kg
Input the value of bullet in the formulae;
Kinetic Energy= 1/2x0.01kgx(400)^2
K.E=800J
Input value of the ball:
Kinetic Energy=1/2x80kgx(6.5)^2
K.E=1690J
Which means that th Energy of the ball is more than the bullet.
Answer: 7.53 μC
Explanation: In order to explain this problem we have to use the gaussian law so we have:
∫E.dS=Qinside/εo we consider a gaussian surface inside the conducting spherical shell so E=0
Q inside= 0 = q+ Qinner surface=0
Q inner surface= 1.12μC so in the outer surface the charge is (8.65-1.12)μC=7.53μC
Answer: 0.85 meters (with and without sigfigs)
Explanation: To find the wavelength, you just have to switch around the equation for wave speed: v (wave speed) = λ (wavelength)*f (frequency) so λ (wavelength) = v (wave speed)/f (frequency). You don't have the wave speed but you can calculate it. Since wave speed is measured in meters/second or m/s, you just have to divide the amount of meters you were given by the amount of seconds. You will get 340 m/s. Next, you have to plug the values into the equation: λ (wavelength) = 340 m/s (wave speed)/400 Hz (frequency). The answer is 0.85 meters (seconds cancel) and has the correct number of significant figures.