The news sources form of the speech might not have the speech entirely, meaning that the clips they do have could be easily taken out of context.
A personal reading of the transcript has the full speech, and it can be interpreted fully without anything being taken out of context.
Answer:
was having/had
Explanation:
it depends on the context outside of it to. For example if you were telling a story and that was a detail it would be "was having" but any other context would be "had"
D. I spent three days drying the rice
“So you see!” -dhar man
It would be both the parents and the doctors. The schools are the ones who had the machines installed in the first place and the students are the ones who take the most kick out of it.
Doctors, as we know, are experts in health and living conditions, which means that they know it’s a health risk for those who tend to consume sodas more often then they should.
Parents only want the best for their children and soda/pop are considered bad for the digestive system if consumed in massive amounts. Because parents don’t have complete control on their children at school, the freedom of course the child has gets exploited.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
The correct answer is: objective scientific reasoning.
Explanation:
Postmodernist literature was influenced by objective scientific reasoning, especially when it comes to the writer's efforts to explain reality around us. Postmodernist writers valued above everything a concrete experience and outcomes of the theories based on political, psychological and philosophical researches.
The reality is represented as objective and logically independent of humans, accompanied by the universal truth that universal truth doesn't exist.
