Answer and Explanation:
The Residential properties are depreciated over 27.5 years
Then:
The total amount of depreciation is $15,635. We assume that the property is sold in 2015.
Therefore, depreciation will be allowed only for 5 years such that the annual depreciation will be $3127 for 5 years.
He saves $781.75 annually (0.25*$3127).
If he holds the property for 5 years and then sells it, his 5 years' worth of depreciation will have saved him $3908.75 and it a $10,000 gain taxed at a maximum of 15%
$10,000 gain taxed at a maximum of 25% (or 33% if the gain pushes the taxpayer into a higher tax bracket).
$10,000 gain taxed at a maximum of 25%
Answer: D) Lila's employer has violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, we can infer that Lila's employer has violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 simply protects employees against firm of discrimination that are based on sex, color, race, national origin, and religion.
Since Lila is pregnant and due for promotion but the promotion was given to Harry, she has been discriminated upon based on her sex.
Therefore, the correct option is D.
Corinne is very excited because she works with a new company that uses due diligence to track these precious metals from mine to manufacturer to ensure they are not "conflict metals. ".
<h3>What is Due Diligence?</h3>
This refers to the conscious steps which a person takes in order to ensure that he is not committing an offense or taking a good background check.
Hence, we can see that because of Corinne's work with a major electronics company, she is charged with doing due diligence on the raw materials to ensure that they are not "conflict metals. ".
Read more about due diligence here:
brainly.com/question/26383473
Answer:
fails to achieve the minimum average total costs attainable at each level of output.
Explanation:
X Inefficiency do take place in a firm when there is little or no incentive in controlling costs. As a result of this average cost of production will go up than necessary. And as a result of lack of incentives, technically, the firm will be far from efficient. It should be noted that X-inefficiency could be described as a situation in which a firm fails to achieve the minimum average total costs attainable at each level of output.
I m pretty sure the product supply would grow then the price would drop