Yes, often more power actually. When you’re trying to convince someone of something the most powerful and swaying argument is one that includes a certain amount of emotion (pathos). So for example, instead of just speaking about dying animals to argue for climate change, it is much more effective to tell a personal or emotional story involving the effects climate change has had a you or other real people. Hope that helps :)
Answer:
vvv
Explanation:
Pros
-------
-If people disagree with your opinion, you won't get any backlash from it as they won't know who you are.
-you can say your opinion without feeling ashamed of it, or feeling like other people are judging <em>you</em>, as they can't as they don't know who you are.
Cons
------
- People are likely to use your anonymity to undermine your opinion.
Sorry, cant think of any more, hope this helps
:)
I think the answer is B, not 100% sure though.
Answer: um this is kinda a personal question so it depends how you answer it because it says you not me.
Sorry I can’t help
1) "... the distance of Hawaii from Japan makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks ago... [during which] the Japanese Government has deliberately sought... [false] hope for continued peace."
2) "The attack yesterday on the Hawaiian Islands... American ships have been reported torpedoed..., [and] yesterday the Japanese government also launched an attack against Malaya.. Last night Japanese forces attacked the Philippine Islands..."
The first excerpt shows that Japan gave the US a false sense of hope by saying they are reigning in their expansions and hope to continue to have peaceful relations with the United States. The second excerpt then shows what Franklin was talking about, in that they used the 'guise of peace to backstab the US in hopes of continuing their expansion eastward.
