By inference, the way in which Zaroff is portrayed as Rainsford’s foil is that: "Zaroff is a person without a conscience, but Rainsford has one." (Option B)
<h3>What is the explanation for the above inference?</h3>
As evidenced by the excerpt, Zaroff is not opposed to murdering others, which he regards as a form of hunting.
He has no regard for human life and is unconcerned whether they live or die, which distinguishes his character from Rainsford's.
Learn more about inference at;
brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
PLZZZ BRAINLIEST I ONLY NEED ONE MOREE
Question: In order to reach fundamental convictions that he can call his own, Descartes decides to sweep aside all the opinions he had learned “at school.” However he is careful to distinguish his position from that of the skeptics. What is the distinction he makes?
Answer:
Descartes is untroubled by the fact that, as he has described them, mind and matter are very different: One is spatial and the other not, and therefore one cannot act upon the other. ... It is the nature of bodies to be in space, and the nature of minds not to be in space, Descartes claims.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
urge people to follow in Dr. King’s footsteps in the fight against injustices.
hope this helps! :3
a broken girl ,
in a broken home,
dreams left unspoken of,
and everything became left!
"bam" goes the doors,
the yelling begins,
for real screams the girl,
as she gets left alone?