Answer:
depreciable amor 10.95 dollars per Activity 2 base cost object.
Explanation:
totoal expected cst: 35,040
activity 2 expected cost dirver Total 3,200
Activity rate: $35,040 cost pool / 3,200 driver expected amount = $10.95
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer:
D) declaring victory too soon
Explanation:
John Kotter in this theory of leadership explains the concept and importance of change. He basically believes that the company shall be currently functional.
By the term currently functional he means that the company shall be updated and working on with the current market trend. This means the company shall not be resistant to change and that the management shall take a note of it.
Further in the moving scenario there is no freezing point - the company shall constantly work on the new things which it can improve and excel.
Thus, final confirmation cannot be made soon as towards the change made.
Answer:
A) Yes, the employment contract has been breached, but the non-competition agreement has not been breached.
Explanation:
Xuechen signed a three year employment contract which she breached after a short time by quitting her job. The non competition agreement that she signed required her not to work as a chef for another restaurant, but since she is working as a manager, then she didn't breach that contract.
Answer:
Emma Burnley has a wide span of control
Explanation:
Span of control is defined as the number of subordinates that are directly reporting to a manager . It can be narrow or wide depending on the number of reporting employees.
In a situation where a large numbers and layers of employee report to a particular manager , it is called a wide span of control
Employees get more responsibilities with less supervision and get motivated. However , the manager might just get overworked and have trouble making decision.
