Answer:
If we compare the p value and using the significance level given we have so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% or 1% of significance we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Step-by-step explanation:
It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.
The significance level is not provided but we can assume it as . First we need to calculate the degrees of freedom like this:
The next step would be calculate the p value for this test. Since is a bilateral test or two tailed test, the p value would be:
If we compare the p value and using the significance level given we have so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% or 1% of significance we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
We know that the perimeter of a rectangle is twice the length, plus twice the width.
P = 2L + 2W
We also know that the perimeter is 156.
P = 156
Finally, we know that the width is 12 less than the length.
W = L - 12.
The next thing that we do is substitute the information that we have into the original equation:
P = 2L + 2W
156 = 2L + 2(L - 12)
From this point we start to solve
156 = 2L + 2L - 24 <---we multiplied the '2' through the parenthesis
156 + 24 = 2L + 2L - 24 + 24
180 = 2L + 2L <--- getting like terms on same sides
180 = 4L <---combining like terms
180/4 = 4L/4 <--- getting like terms on same sides
45 = L <---now we have a value for L
Now we take the known value for L and substitute it in to our equation for W
W = L - 12
W = 45 - 12
W = 33
So now we have Length = 45 and Width = 33.
The value of the collection originally was $1,000,000
What was the original value of the collection?
The original value of the collection is not known, hence, it is represented by X
The increase in value by $50,000 means that the value is X+$50,000
Now, when the error was discovered, it is now worth half of the value previously
The new value is (X+$50,000)*0.5
New value=(X+$50,000)*0.5
The new value at this point is $525,000
$525,000=(X+$50,000)*0.5
$525,000/0.5=X+$50,000
$1,050,000=X+$50,000
X=$1,050,000-$50,000
Find out more about change in value on:brainly.com/question/13097163
#SPJ1
<u>Answer:</u>
A. y = -2 - cos(x-π)
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u>The general form of the trig equation is:</u>
y = A sin (Bx + C) + D
where:
A is the amplitude
is the period
is the phase shift
D is the vertical shift
<u>Now, let's check the choices:</u>
<u>A. y = -2 - cos(x-π)</u>
Therefore, the function has a phase shift of π
<u>B. y = 3 cos(4x)</u>
Therefore, the function has no phase shift
<u>C. y = tan(2x)</u>
Therefore, the function has no phase shift
<u>D. y = 1 + sin(x)</u>
Therefore, the function has no phase shift
<u>Based on the above,</u> the correct answer is A
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
An angle is considered a defined term in geometry because defined terms are terms that have a formal definition and can be defined using other geometrical terms.
Angle: Two rays that share the same endpoint, however, the rays take off in different directions. The area in the middle of the two rays is the angle measure.