Answer:
B) President Truman's experience on Pennsylvania Avenue was not glamorous, and, in November of 1950, it became dangerous.
Explanation:
Transitions are single words, phrases or sentences that establish a logical connection between sentences and paragraphs. They develop a sense of what is to come later in the content. Transitions maintain a logical flow of ideas and provoke the reader to think and keep reading for new and interesting information.
In the current example, B is the appropriate transition as it conveys to the reader that something substantial is about to happen without mentioning the actual event.
<span>Now Britain had never been visited by the Romans, and was entirely unknown to them before the time of Caius Julius Caesar, who, in the year 693 after the foundation of Rome, but the sixtieth year before the Incarnation of our Lord, was consul with Lucius Bibulus. While he was making war upon the Germans and the Gauls, who were divided only by the river Rhine, he came into the province of the Morini, whence is the nearest and shortest passage into Britain. Here, having provided about eighty ships of burden and fast-sailing vessels, he sailed over into Britain; where, being first roughly handled in a battle, and then caught in a storm, he lost a considerable part of his fleet, no small number of foot-soldiers, and almost all his cavalry. Returning into Gaul, he put his legions into winter-quarters, and gave orders for building six hundred sail of both sorts. With these he again crossed over early in spring into Britain, but, whilst he was marching with the army against the enemy, the ships, riding at anchor, were caught in a storm and either dashed one against another, or driven upon the sands and wrecked. Forty of them were lost, the rest were, with much difficulty, repaired. Caesar’s cavalry was, at the first encounter, defeated by the Britons, and there Labienus, the tribune, was slain. In the second engagement, with great hazard to his men, he defeated the Britons and put them to flight. Thence he proceeded to the river Thames, where a great multitude of the enemy had posted themselves on the farther side of the river, under the command of Cassobellaunus, and fenced the bank of the river and almost all the ford under water with sharp stakes: the remains of these are to be seen to this day, apparently about the thickness of a man’s thigh, cased with lead, and fixed immovably in the bottom of the river. This being perceived and avoided by the Romans, the barbarians, not able to stand the charge of the legions, hid themselves in the woods, whence they grievously harassed the Romans with repeated sallies. In the meantime, the strong state of the Trinovantes, with their commander Androgius, surrendered to Caesar, giving him forty hostages. Many other cities, following their example, made a treaty with the Romans. Guided by them, Caesar at length, after severe fighting, took the town of Cassobellaunus, situated between two marshes, fortified by sheltering woods, and plentifully furnished with all necessaries. After this, Caesar returned from Britain into Gaul, but he had no sooner put his legions into winter quarters, than he was suddenly beset and distracted with wars and sudden risings on every side.</span>
Answer:
In The True Confessions of Charlotte Doyle, Charlotte is accused of a serious crime that she didn’t commit. There was this one time I got accused of stealing my sisters food. I said I didn't take it but I actually did take her food. Me and my sister would always play around like that. She would steal my food and I would steal hers. When she found out I took her food she got mad then sticked her tongue out at me and stool my food. Why did Charlotte keep the dirk? Charlotte was bored living on the ship because she didn't have her family and she was also upper-class. This changed because she got to meet the crew and the captain face-to-face, she also met new people that are really nice like Zachariah. Ever sense that time I still still steal my sisters food and she still steals mine.
Implied (or implicit) textual evidence is suggested but not directly stated. When a reader comes across implied textual evidence, they have to:
put together details in the text to draw a conclusion and make educated guesses.
Reading between the lines is very vague, but you do have to infer (or draw a conclusion) with this technique.
Finding direct statements in the text that leave no room for doubt is explicit evidence (directly stated). This is the only one I would not mark.