Answer:
$87 million
Explanation:
The projected benefit obligation (PBO) is a measurement of the present amount of money needed by a company to cover future pension liabilities. PBO uses how long the employee will work and any increased future obligations to the employee's pension.
Given that:
PBO at the beginning of the year = $80 million
Service cost for the year = $10 million
Interest = Discount rate × PBO at beginning of the year = 5% × $80 million = 0.05 × $80 million = $4 million
Actuarial (gain) Loss = Amount paid - Expected money = $5 million - $4 million = $1 million
Benefits paid paid by trustees = $6 million
The total pension expense for the year = PBO at year beginning + Service cost + interest - Actuarial (gain) Loss - benefits = $80 million + $10 million + $4 million - $1 million - $6 million = $87 million
According to goal-setting theory, in order for goals to enhance motivation and performance they must be: B. accompanied by feedback.
<h3>What is motivation ?</h3>
Motivation is something that help to increase a worker or an employee performance and productivity.
For a goals which a company what to accomplish to enhance motivation such goals must depend on the feedback received.
Therefore the correct option is B.
Learn more about motivation here:brainly.com/question/6853726
#SPJ1
Answer: $186,000
Explanation:
January is the 2nd month from November which means that all of November's $31,000 will be collected in January.
January is the first month after December so 30% of December sales should be collected in January. 50% has already been collected in December and this left $50,000.
Total credit sales in December must have been:
= 50,000 / 50%
= $100,000
Amount to be collected in January for December:
= 100,000 * 30%
= $30,000
Amount to be collected from January credit sales:
= 50% * 150,000
= $75,000
January cash sales = $50,000
Total cash in January :
= 31,000 + 30,000 + 75,000 + 50,000
= $186,000
Answer:
D. Primary question
Answer:
b. Hire an external consultant to pick new team members for you.
Explanation:
The most appropriate option, analyzing the scenario above, would be to hire an external consultant to choose new team members for you, due to the fact that there is difficulty in choosing the qualification of the team and the volunteers who applied for the positions, so an external consultant could take this decision based on adequate parameters and less supported by biased behaviors that could favor some more volunteer by affinity or another issue that was not purely professional. In this way, a fairer, less conflicting and appropriate contracting would occur for everyone in the organization.
