Answer:
c. $3,600
Explanation:
The total cost of orange juice = $30,400 + $13,000
The total cost of orange juice = $43,400
So, the profit on the orange juice = $53,000 - $43,400 = $9,600
Profit when oranges are sold without juice = $36,400 - $30,400
Profit when oranges are sold without juice = $6,000
So, extra income = $$9,600 - $6,000 = $3,600
Thus, the net benefit (additional income) from processing the oranges into orange juice instead of selling as is would be is $3,600
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
The cost of goods manufactured is computed as;
Beginning inventory
$25,300
Add ;
Raw materials purchases
$106,100
Cost of goods available for sale
$131,400
Less:
Ending inventory
$39,100
Cost of goods sold
$92,300
Add:
Beginning work in process
$24,100
Less:
Ending work in process
($26,600)
Cost of goods manufactured
$89,800
There is some concern that increased use of electronic databases could prompt the need for legislation protecting employee privacy rights.
An electronic database is a computer-based collection also listing of the information. Through this the information can be searched in a fast and easy manner.
Electronic databases held organized collections of data, or information, which is thus stored in a computer in a readable form. So sometimes, the increased use of electronic databases might probably prompt the need for legislation which protects employee privacy rights.
Hence, the electronic databases can make it easier to search, query, filter and retrieve required data.
To learn more about legislation here:
brainly.com/question/13672467
#SPJ4
Answer:
B: 40%
Explanation:
Total shares = 2 + 1 + 2 = 5 million
percentage owned by me = 2/5 *100 = 40%
Answer:
1. Under command-and-control regulation, the government will sometimes specify the technology that firms must use in production. TRUE, e.g. currently the US government banned Huawei from providing 5G technology in the US due to security concerns even though that provides the best 5G technology in the world.
2. The government may decide on a specific amount of pollution that firms can legally emit. TRUE, the EPA sets the standards and companies must follow them, whether they are too high or too low maybe subject to an extensive debate.
3. A limitation of a command-and-control regulation is that firms have no incentive to remove pollution once they are within the legal pollution limits. TRUE, if the company is complying with current regulation, then that is all it needs to keep functioning without any problem.
4. Command and control situations are always the best option when it comes to reducing the amount of pollution. FALSE, when is the government or Congress the most efficient at doing something. Efficiency is not a characteristic of any government entity.
5. Command-and-control is more flexible than market-based regulation. FALSE, the terms command and control should give you an idea that government intervention can be anything but flexible.
6. A command-and-control regulation is subject to political considerations. TRUE, command and control regulation is set up by government agencies or Congress and both are political entities by definition. E.g. some governments impose harder environmental controls through the EPA, others impose softer or no controls at all.
