Answer:
FALSE
Since 0.385 < 0.526, the value for week 3 is accepted.
Explanation:
Qexp = (|Xq - Xₙ₋₁|)/w
where Xq is the suspected outlier; Xₙ₋₁ is the next nearest data point; w is the range of data
First, the data are arranged in decreasing order, from highest to lowest:
3. 5.6
2. 5.1
8. 5.1
1. 4.9
6. 4.9
5. 4.7
7. 4.5
4. 4.3
Xq = 5.6; Xₙ₋₁ = 5.1; w = 5.6 - 4.3 = 1.3
Qexp = (|5.6 - 5.1|)/1.3 = 0.385
From tables, at 95% confidence level, for n = 8, Qcrit = 0.526
Since 0.385 < 0.526, the value for week 3 is accepted.
Answer:
watching a firefly is much different than watching a fire because watching a fire can make you hot and watching a firefly can make you happy
Answer: 
Explanation:Bond energy of H-H is 436.4 kJ/mole
Bond energy of C-H is 414 kJ/mol
Bond energy of C=C is 620 kJ/mol
Bond energy of C≡C is 835 kJ/mol
= {1B.E(C≡C)+2B.E(C-H) +1B.E(H-H)} - {1B.E(C=C)+4B.E(C-H)}
Do you have a screen shot or picture of the problem?
I believe it's about the dislodging response as Ag structures solvent salt with nitrate. For dislodging response, more receptive metal will uproot less receptive metal from the arrangement. In your question, the reactivity of the metal are positioned as takes after: Mg > Cu > Ag. Take note of that more responsive metals, that are Mg and Cu, are in the arrangement.
