Answer:
The difference in tax to be paid between the two methods is $455
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to calculate the difference in tax for the LIFO and FIFO method.
The matter of importance here is that the tax rate is 35%. We proceed as follows:
For the FIFO income, the tax rate is 35% of 8,600 = 35/100 * 8600 = $3010
For the LIFO method, the tax rate is 35% of $7,300 = 35/100 * 7,300 = $2,555
The difference in tax that would be paid between the two methods is 3010-2555 = $455
Answer:
b. $2.50
Explanation:
Dividend paid = 45%*12,50,000
= $562500
dividend per share = 562500/225000
= $2.50
Therefore, The dividend per share should it declare is $2.50
Answer:
$ 75131
Explanation:
Given:
Amount inherited = $ 300000
Present amount of annuity = $ 300000
Interest rate, i = 8% = 0.08
number of years, n = 5
Now,
the formula for the present amount of annuity is given as:
Present amount of annuity = ![P[\frac{1-(1+i)^{-n}}{i}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2Bi%29%5E%7B-n%7D%7D%7Bi%7D%5D)
where,
P is the periodic payment
n is the number of years
now, on substituting the values, we get
$ 300000 = ![P[\frac{1-(1+0.08)^{-5}}{0.08}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2B0.08%29%5E%7B-5%7D%7D%7B0.08%7D%5D)
or
$ 300000 = P × 3.993
or
P = $ 75131.48 ≈ $ 75131
hence, the amount he can withdraw is $ 75131
Answer:
a. The quality of rental housing units falls
c. The quantity of available rental housing units falls.
Explanation:
As the landlord cannot receive a desired return for their investment they will stop improving and doing proper maintenance of the property to obtain it.
They will also be less likely to rent and would prefer to sale and move away from the real-state investment business in the region to more profitable region or better business. This will make the ernt go up as there is less offer as well so the policy backfires.
Stoping the market to work property will cause market failures and the outcome won't be the desired
Answer:
Taking $1 from Carl and giving it to Andy would increase society's total utility.
Explanation:
Since Andy's income is less than other three people when a $1 taken from Carl would increase Andy's utility more than the loss in utility of Carl. Thats why total utility would increase.
