She utilized the term to express that there are insufficient ladies in administrative positions.
<h3>What do you understand by Tokenism?</h3>
Tokenism is a social idea that arose amidst the dark battle for social liberties in the US during the 1950s. Stringently talking, tokenism is a repetitive practice in conditions where primary persecutions of race.
Orientation are the objective of basic mindfulness work and asserting that minirarian gatherings can get to freedoms denied to them, packing in the possession of the not many what we call social honor.
In light of this, Chisholm utilized the term tokenism to declare that despite the fact that ladies are most of the populace, in some cases ladies involve administrative situations in the public arena, and not in view of absence of limit, but rather on the grounds that ladies have not arrived at the norm of fairness they merit.
For more information about token, refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/24965046
#SPJ1
1. Assuming that the underlined words are 'Carl Sandburg,' the correct answer is A. simple subject. Although you may be led to believe this is a complete subject (because it consists of more than one word), in fact, it is not. Carl Sandburg is the name and the surname of one person, which is why it is considered to be a simple, rather than a complete subject.
2. Assuming that the underlined words are '<span>served as a soldier during the Spanish-American War,' the correct answer is D. complete predicate. As you can see, these words include the simple verb served, as well as all other words which modify, or describe that verb. This is why this is complete, rather than a simple predicate. Simple predicate would be only the word served.
3. Assuming that the underlined words are 'would influence,' the correct answer is B. simple predicate. Similarly to the first sentence, you may be led to believe this is complete because there are more than one word in the phrase. However, the verb phrase would influence is considered to be one entity given that it is only a particular tense of that verb. Even if it said 'had been influencing' instead of 'would influence,' it would still be a simple predicate.</span>
Answer:
C disheartened
Explanation:
i said disheartened because despondent means loss of hope or in low spirit and disheartened is the same in meaning
Answer:
We need to defuse this increasingly acrimonious situation
Explanation:
hope it helps you!!!
please mark as brainliest
Answer:
i think it would have to be c
Explanation:
