Answer:
A) Company A is the one that is financially leveraged.
Where there is the presence of debt in the capital structure of a firm, that firm is said to be Financially leveraged.
B) A is true.
A company's return on equity or expected returns increases because the use of leverage increases stock volatility. Volatility increases its level of risk which in turn increases returns. This happens only if the company is operating an ideal level of financial leverage.
On the other hand, however, but excessive debt can increase the risk of default and can lead to low returns or even bankruptcy.
Cheers!
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
Executive compensation depends on the overall performance of the company sequentially. It depends on various factors which determine the success of the organization. There has being a tool where the overall performance of the company and its overall standpoint is mentioned explaining in detail the occurrence of various events. Balanced score card is nothing but a report card explaining performance. Executive compensation attracts a clause of payment of a certain percentage only after achieving certain specific performance targets. Balanced score cards includes following things
Learning and growth perspective: it includes what the employees learn from the system, their training which is an essential aspect to increase their productivity.
Business perspective: determines how business are performing with regards market capitalization or client conversion ratios, also concerns about the region the business is growing into.
customer perspective: what customer wants, and what is being delivered to him, it helps company to close the gap to increase quality of delivery
Financial perspective: explains ratios, profits, losses, analysis regarding the financial position of the company.
Answer:
<em><u>Fleis</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>man</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Job </u></em><em><u>Analysis</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>System</u></em>
Explanation:
<em>Fleishman Job Analysis </em><em>System.</em><em> </em><em>Job </em><em>analysis</em><em> </em><em>technique</em><em> </em><em>that </em><em>asks </em><em>subject</em><em>-</em><em>matter </em><em>expert</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>to </em><em>evaluate</em><em> </em><em>a </em><em>job </em><em>in </em><em>t</em><em>erms </em><em>of </em><em>the </em><em>abilities</em><em> </em><em>required</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>o </em><em>perform </em><em>the </em><em>job.</em><em> </em><em>-</em><em> </em><em>use</em><em>f</em><em>ul </em><em>for </em><em>employee </em><em>selection</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>training</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>and </em><em>car</em><em>e</em><em>er </em><em>development</em><em> </em><em>Competency.</em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em>
Answer:
the options are missing, so I looked for them:
a. The buying of government bonds leads to lower interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
b. The selling of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
c. The selling of government bonds leads to lower interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
d. The buying of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
the answer is:
b. The selling of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
Explanation:
The crowding out effect happens when the government increases its spending level in order to engage in an expansionary fiscal policy but someone needs to pay for this extra spending. In order for the government to finance their spending, they have to choose to either increase taxes or issue more debt. When they issue more debt, they end up decreasing private investment since money that could be used by private companies is used by the government instead.
