The correct is option B) She had eyes that looked as if they could see a long way into things.
The answer which best describes Mrs. Peters is - she had eyes that looked as if they could see a long way into things.
The first one is directed toward Mrs. Hale, and the others are directed at Mrs. Foster. You may notice this while Mrs. Peters is speaking with the Sheriff.
While the other persons who had been questioned appeared to be in the darkness, Mrs. Peters appeared to be trembling and terrified, as if she knew something that the other people don't know.
Learn more about "A Jury of Her Peers?"
brainly.com/question/16014464
#SPJ4
Correct Question
Which of these best describes Mrs. Peters in "A Jury of Her Peers?"
A) She hated to see things half done.
B) She had eyes that looked as if they could see a long way into things.
C) She used to wear pretty clothes and be lively
D) She was real sweet and pretty, but kind of timid and—fluttery.
The line from which Helen grey implies that the author thinks physical beauty is not the most valuable quality would be “but so you miss that modest charm; which is the surest charm of them all” there’s no focus on any physical attribute but instead on the modesty of Helen grey
The question above is intended to assess your interpretation of reading "The Outsiders" and your ability to write a persuasive letter. For that reason, I cannot write this letter to you, but I will show you how to write it.
First of all, you should know that Paul Holden is an old friend of Darry, Ponyboy's brother. He's always trying to stir up riots and pick fights with Darry.
You also need to know that a persuasive letter is a letter that wants to convince the reader to think or do something a certain way.
Based on that, you can write the letter as follows:
- Start with a greeting. That greeting might be "Dear Paul Holden."
- Start a paragraph with the author of the letter introducing himself and showing his reason for writing this letter.
- Start another paragraph the author of the letter shows the reasons why the rumble should not happen.
- Have the author of the letter point out the advantages that everyone would have access to if the rumble didn't happen and why this is so important.
- End the letter by thanking the reader of the letter for understanding and show the author of the letter to say goodbye.
Don't forget that the author of the letter needs to be convincing, so he must show specific and powerful reasons why the rumble doesn't occur.
More information:
brainly.com/question/3907203?referrer=searchResults
brainly.com/question/18903673?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Presidential reputations rise or fall with gross domestic product. The state of the economy can determine if presidents are re-elected, and it shapes historical memory of their success or failure.
In the news media, we often use the handover of power as the time for assessing the economic record of the departing president. (I’ve done it myself recently.) Some economists have predicted that the Trump administration could create the next recession or financial crisis. And scholars have studied the relative economic conditions generated by Republicans and Democrats for predictive meaning (Democrats have done better since World War II, they found).
But the reality is that presidents have far less control over the economy than you might imagine. Presidential economic records are highly dependent on the luck of where the nation is in the economic cycle. And the White House has no control over the demographic and technological forces that influence the economy
A. Parallel plots
The two women are both fending for themselves while their husbands are away fighting a war. Same plot but in a different time.