Answer: 3. <em>Interpretation-Evaluation. </em>Jamie concludes that Sarah is mad at her.
Perception is the process by which humans are made aware of their world. It consists of five stages: stimulation, organization, interpretation-evaluation, memory and recall.
This is an example of interpretation-evaluation, as this stage consists on comparing a stimuli with one's past experiences, and giving it a meaning through that process. In the example, Jamie has had experience with people being angry at her, maybe even Sarah. Based on her expectations of how someone behaves when mad, she concludes Sarah must be mad too because Sarah's behaviour matches Jamie's preconceived notions.
The answer is true because they can grow over a 100 years or so and they are documented to be 450 years old that was before Columbus discovered America where America was ruled by native Americans ever since the ice age started and ended 10,000 years ago.
Answer:
1. A pencil, four sheets of paper, and a ruler.
Explanation:
The sentence has no verb.
Answer:
1) This passage does not contain an argument. It begins with a comment that everyone knows the U.S. is having an election (in 2008); the author proceeds to state three things that he thinks Europe should focus on. He does not offer reasons for his statement that these three things are jobs, Muslims, and neighbors.
2) This passage contains both an argument and a sub-argument. 1.The butler was passionately in love with the victim. Thus, 2. It was not the butler who committed the murder. 3. Either the butler committed the murder or the judge committed the murder. Therefore, 4. The judge committed the murder. The sub-argument goes from (1) to (2), and the main argument goes from (2) and (3) to (4). Note again: identifying the structure does not imply saying that this is a good argument.
3) This passage contains an argument. Standardization: (1) No one who uses a relatively unreliable procedure in order to decide whether to punish can know whether that other person deserves punishment. (2) No one who cannot know whether another person deserves punishment has a right to punish that person. Therefore, (3) No one who uses a relatively unreliable procedure in order to decide whether to punish another person has a right to punish that person.
The answer to your problem is C emotional. please mark my responce as brainliest, it will help me a lot.
